PEOPLE ARE THE MAIN OBJECT OF PROTECTION IN BUILDINGS WITH DANGEROUS NATURAL PHENOMENA
Abstract
Despite the current natural hazard in Russia, when most of its vast territory may be exposed to the effects of various hazardous natural phenomena, in all federal laws and regulations of the Russian Federation construction content is not even recognized as the "main object of protection" from these influences. So, one of the indicators of not recognizing people as the "main object of protection" when exposed to hazardous natural phenomena is the lack of provisions in federal laws and regulations of the Russian Federation of construction content, which should address the protection of people's health in buildings under impacts, for example, earthquakes, fires. And this is despite the truth long ago established by medical scientists that in case of an earthquake or fire, the protection of people's health depends on the space-planning and design solutions of buildings. Therefore, the article substantiates that without recognizing people as the "main object of protection" in buildings under dangerous natural phenomena, it is simply impossible to protect people's life and health under these dangerous influences.
References
2. Melnikov A.V. Psihogennye rasstrojstva u postradavshih vo vremya zemletryaseniya // Psihicheskie rasstrojstva u postradavshih vo vremya zemletryaseniya v Armenii: Sb. nauch. tr. M.: NII obshej i sudebnoj psihiatrii im. V.P. Serbskogo. 1989. S. 54-61.
3. Maslyaev A.V. Sohranenie zdorovya lyudej, nahodyashihsya v zdaniyah pri zemletryasenii / A.V. Maslyaev // Prirodnye i tehnogennye riski. Bezopasnost sooruzhenij. 2014. № 2. S. 38-42.
4. Aleksandrovskij Yu.A. Pogranichnye nervno- psihicheskie rasstrojstva: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachej. Rostov n/D: Feniks. 1997. 576 s.
5. Ananin I.V. Usherb, svyazannyj s vozdejstviem zemletryasenij na psihichskoe sostoyanie cheloveka / I.V. Ananin // Federalnaya sistema sejsmologicheskih nablyudenij i prognoza zemletryasenij. Inform.- analitich. byulleten MChS Rossii. - 1994. - № 4. - S. 45-48.
6. Vahov V.P. Psihicheskie narusheniya u sluzhashih organizovannyh kollektivov v rajone bedstvij/ V.P. Vahov; NII obshej i sudebnoj psihiatrii im. V.P. Serbskogo// Psihich. rasstrojstva u postradavshih vo vremya zemletryaseniya v Armenii: Sb. nauch. tr. - M., 1989. - S. 34-41.
7. Lobastov O.S., Levchenko S.L. Nekotorye zakonomernosti vozniknoveniya i techeniya patologicheskih reakcij straha u lyudej v zhilyh pomesheniyah, okazavshihsya v rajone zemletryaseniya L: Voenno-medicinskaya akademiya im. S.M. Kirova. 1983.
8. Maslyaev A.V. Raschet zdanij i sooruzhenij dlya sohraneniya zhizni i zdorovya lyudej pri zemletryasenii // Zhilishnoe stroitelstvo. 2009. - № 8. S. 33-35.
9. Maslyaev A.V. Vibracionnoe vozdejstvie konstrukcij zdanij na lyudej pri zemletryasenii // Zhilishnoe stroitelstvo. 2007. № 12. C. 23-24
10. Aptikaev F.F., Maslyaev A.V. Zashita zhizni i zdorovya lyudej ne priznayutsya glavnoj celyu pri vozvedenii zdanij v Rossii // Zhilishnoe stroitelstvo. 2019. № 11. S. 58-64. DOI: htts:// doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2019-11-5864.
11. Maslyaev A.V. Sejsmozashita zdanij v naselennyh punktah dlya sohraneniya zhizni i zdorovya lyudej pri zemletryasenii. Volgograd: Vogogradskij gosudarstvennyj tehnicheskij universitet. 2018. 149.s.
12. Hain V.E., Lomidze M.G. Geotektonika s osnovami geodinamiki. M. : MGU. 1995. 480 s.
13. Muratov M.V. Proishozhdenie materikov i okeanskih vpadin. M.: Nauka. 1975. 176 s.
14. Yudahin F.N., Shukin Yu.K., Makarov V.I. Glubinnoe stroenie i sovremennye geodinamicheskie processy v litosfere VostochnoEvropejskoj platformy. Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN. 2003. 300 s.
15. Maslyaev A.V. Stroitelnaya sistema Rossii ne priznaet vozdejstviya povtornyh zemletryasenij na stroitelnye obekty // Amerikanskij nauchnyj zhurnal. № 38.2020. S.4149. doi:10.31618/asj. 2707-9864.2020.1/ 38/12.
16. Maslyaev A.V. Sejsmozashita naselennyh punktov Rossii s uchetom faktora «nepredskazuemosti ocherednogo opasnogo prirodnogo yavleniya» // Zhilishnoe stroitelstvo. 2017. № 11. S.43-47.
17. Maslyaev A. V. The Russian construction system’s goal of reducing the cost of mass residential and public buildings // ISSN 0747-9239, Seismic Instruments, 2020, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 237–243 DOI: 10.3103/SO747923920020073.
18. Yudakhin F.N. About one importen feature in structure of Earth crust // Abstract volume of 31-st International Geological Congress. Rio-de-Janeiro, Brasil, August 6-17, 2000.
19. Yudakhin F.N. The origin of Fennoscandia’s uplift // Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 5. 2003. Abstracts of the Contributions of the EGS-EUQ joint Assambly, Nice, France, 06-11 April, 2003.
20. Medvedev S. V. Seismic intensity scale MSK76. Publ. Inst. Geophys. Pol. Asad. Sc., A-6 (117), 1977. P. 95-102.
21. Aptikaev F.F. Erteleva O.O. Vertical component problem for seismic hazard analysis // Seismology and Engineering Seismology ( ed. M.D. Trifunac). The International conference on Earthquake Engineering “The Banja Luka Earthquake – Forty Years of Engineering Experience”, 26-28 Oct. 2009. Banja Luka, Republic of Serbska, Bosnia and Herzegovina: N.I.G.D. Nezavisne novine, d.o.o. 2009. P. 77-86.
22. Gay S.P. Pervasive orthogonal fracturing in Earth’s continental crust. American Stereo Map Co.: Salt Lake City, Utah, 1973. P. 121.
23. Crachev A. F. Intraplate geodynamics and seismity // J. Earthquake Prediction Research. 1992. Vol. 16. P. 87-106.
24. Zoback M. L. , Zoback M. D. , Adams J. et al. Global patterns of tectonic stress // Nature. 1989. Vol. 341. № 6240. P. 292-298.
CC BY-ND
A work licensed in this way allows the following:
1. The freedom to use and perform the work: The licensee must be allowed to make any use, private or public, of the work.
2. The freedom to study the work and apply the information: The licensee must be allowed to examine the work and to use the knowledge gained from the work in any way. The license may not, for example, restrict "reverse engineering."
2. The freedom to redistribute copies: Copies may be sold, swapped or given away for free, in the same form as the original.
